Saturday, December 7, 2013

Holy War as Evangelism


          The Bible recounts the story of Israel, both Old Testament Israel and New Testament Israel.  The plot line of the entire scripture then follows the benchmarks of that story.  It is not surprising, then, to discover that Jesus’ story is told according to the outlines of Israel’s story as its fulfillment.  The church’s story is then told according to this same pattern built on Jesus’ fulfillment.

Story of Israel                Jesus’ Story as Story of Israel Fulfilled                       Church’s Story as Israel/Jesus’ Story

            Key elements of the Church’s Story as Israel/Jesus’ Story included the following:

1.    Exodus from Egypt/Jesus’ great Exodus at the Cross and Resurrection (Lk.9:31); Church participates in Jesus’ Exodus through baptism (Rom.6:1-4; 1 Cor.10:1-7)

2.    Journey to Promised Land/Commissions at close of Gospels (Mt. 28:16-20, Mk.1:8; Lk.24:44-49; John 20:19-23)

3.    Conquest/Settling of Promised Land/Holy War/Evangelism (Acts; 2 Cor.10:3-6)

4.    Life in Promised Land/New Creation (Heb.12:22ff.;Rev.21-22)

          I want to focus on #3, the analogy of Evangelism to the Conquest/Settling/Holy War part of Israel’s story.  I’m not interested in explaining or justifying the phenomenon of Holy War in Israel here, just in developing the analogy between Holy War and Evangelism.  First let’s note eight characteristics of Holy War in Israel (see https://www.biblicaltraining.org/blog/curious-christian/6-19-2012/what-were-characteristics-holy-war-old-testament for more detail) with a suggested analogy to the New Testament practice of evangelism as the way the church extends and implements Jesus’ victory.

A. Israel had no standing army/likewise, evangelists in the church were gifted as such and the whole community was tasked with spreading the message; no pros!    

B. No pay for soldiers or personal spoil or plunder/no personal gain for the Christian or Church

C. Only for the conquest and defense of the Promised Land, not for expansion/same for church; world already belong to Christ and is inheritance of God’s people (Rom.4:13)

D. King has no right to declare war, it has to come from God through a prophet/Evangelism too is at God’s command and initiation delivered through Jesus his Prophet

E. Yahweh does the real fighting/Yahweh fights in Evangelism too; conversion is Yahweh’s work and achievement

F. It is a religious undertaking not a piece of secular military strategy/likewise evangelism is an offering to God not a strategem to achieve political or other purposes

G. The idea of the total annihilation of the enemy/same (2 Cor.10:3-6; Rev.19:11-21)

H. Compromise is failure/same

Of course, let me quickly say that as an analogy to Holy War, evangelism is also quite different in some central respects.  Primarily, the “Holy War” of evangelism is prosecuted by peace, by the “violence of love” (Oscar Romero). It is transformed by Jesus fulfillment of Israel’s Story into an instrument of pacifying the world according to the peace of Christ establishing the well-being of creature and creation through  

Whatever one thinks about Israel’s practice of Holy War, to consider it as wholly unsuitable for Christian reflection is to sacrifice the richness of evangelism as an analogy to Holy War.  I hope this brief exploration may help us recover these dimensions of evangel

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment